A secular monarchial system?

[james]

Hello,

I am currently doing preliminary reasearch for a book on the monarchial systems of the world and am still hesitating over whether to include Atlantium or not. My main issue is how on the FAQ page it is stated that there is no set religion for this empire, when by definition a monarch claims divine right. I mean, even the style of "Majesty" implies "Greatness invested by God".

I would also be interested to know whether His Imperial Majesty is prepared to comment on Sealand; whether that is a "micronation" or not?

Many thanks,

J. Bernthal

[greekboy1981]

I dont know , I think that you can add Atlantium at your list . Better ask the Emperor first ...

[HIM George II]

Hi James,

Monarchial systems are not inherently religious in nature.

That's simply a tradition that's developed in Western Europe over the last millennium, along with the concept of so-called "Divine Right".

I'd be happy to respond to any queries you'd like to send me by email to [e-mail]

[doctor]

James,

Monarchy does not imply that the monarch is enthroned by God. A monarch could rule by popular consent of the people. I just looked up the word "majesty." dictionary.reference.com/browse/majesty

The first definition given is "regal, lofty, or stately dignity; imposing character; grandeur."
The next is "supreme greatness or authority; sovereignty."

There is nothing in either definition that implied that this greatness is invested by God.

A monarch could rule by agreed consent of the members of a secular nation.

Further, if you are going to write a book on monarchical systems, it would be improper scientifically to exclude some data just because it did not fit your conclusion. If you are truly going to explore monarchical systems, it would be proper to explore and examine Antlantium.